Environmental Ethics 3 (3):231-235 (1981)
|Abstract||David Ehrenfeld argues that humanism emphasizes reason at the expense of emotion, and that its narrow focus on the use of reason to serve human interests leads to a dichotomy between man and nature in which ecological factors are subordinated to the satisfaction of human wants. In response, I argue that: (1) humanists stress employment of reflective reason and reason’s interrelations with other aspectsofthe human personality, (2) humanism’s typical commitment to naturalism locates man as part of nature and does not entail an exclusive focus on human interests, and (3) humanism’s commitment to the legitimate sphere of human interests does not entail indifference to nonhuman nature, for a healthy environment is necessary for the long-term satisfaction of human interests|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David E. Klemm (2008). Religion and the Human Future: An Essay on Theological Humanism. Blackwell Pub..
John Carroll (1993). Humanism: The Wreck of Western Culture. Fontana Press.
Tony Davies (2008). Humanism. Routledge.
James J. Valone (1991). Humanism Revisited: A Review of Kate Soper's Humanism and Anti-Humanism. [REVIEW] Human Studies 14 (1):67 - 79.
Paul Kurtz (1998). First Things First. Philo 1 (1):5-14.
Eske Møllgaard (2011). Confucianism as Anthropological Machine. Asian Philosophy 20 (2):127-140.
Desh Raj Sirswal (2010). DR. AMBEDKAR's VIEWS ON HUMANISM AND BUDDHISM. In Dr B. R. Langayan (ed.), Relevance of Thoughts of Dr. Dr. Ambedkar in the Present Times. Sahitya Sansthan, Gajiabad.
Ann V. Murphy (2011). Corporeal Vulnerability and the New Humanism. Hypatia 26 (3):575-590.
David W. Ehrenfeld (1978). The Arrogance of Humanism. Oxford University Press.
Jim Herrick (2003/2005). Humanism: An Introduction. Prometheus Books.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads2 ( #232,382 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?