Graduate studies at Western
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (4):389-405 (2008)
|Abstract||Sweatshop labor is often cited as an example of the worst and most pervasive form of exploitation today, yet understanding what is meant by the charge has proven surprisingly difficult for philosophers. I develop an account of what I call “Needs Exploitation,” grounded in a specification of the duty of beneficence. In the case of sweatshop labor, I argue that employers face a duty to extend to employees a wage sufficient to meet their basic needs. This duty is limited by the degree of the employees’ dependence on the employer for basic needs and a reasonability standard where the employer may remain within a range of well-being between deficiency and luxury.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Allen W. Wood (1995). Exploitation. Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (2):136--158.
Denis G. Arnold (2003). Exploitation and the Sweatshop Quandary. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):243-256.
Greg Godels (1997). Marx, Engels, and the Idea of Exploitation. Nature, Society, and Thought 10 (4):509--522.
Paul McLaughlin (2008). The Ethics of Exploitation. Studia Philosophica Estonica 1 (3):5-16.
Nancy Holmstrom (1983). Marx and Cohen on Exploitation and the Labor Theory of Value. Inquiry 26 (3):287 – 307.
Matt Zwolinski (2007). Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (4):689-727.
Matt Zwolinski (2012). Structural Exploitation. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):154-179.
Jeremy Snyder (2010). Exploitation and Sweatshop Labor: Perspectives and Issues. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):187-213.
Vittorio Bufacchi (2002). The Injustice of Exploitation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (1):1-15.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads67 ( #16,234 of 739,671 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,464 of 739,671 )
How can I increase my downloads?