David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
University of Chicago Press (2006)
A philosophically and historically sensitive account of the engagement of the major protagonists of Victorian British philosophy, Reforming Philosophy considers the controversies between William Whewell and John Stuart Mill on the topics of science, morality, politics, and economics. By situating their debate within the larger context of Victorian society and its concerns, Laura Snyder shows how two very different men—Whewell, an educator, Anglican priest, and critic of science; and Mill, a philosopher, political economist, and parliamentarian—reacted to the challenges of their times, each seeking to reform science as a means of reforming society as a whole. The first book-length examination of the dispute between Mill and Whewell in its entirety, Reforming Philosophy provides a rich and nuanced understanding of the intellectual spirit of Victorian Britain and will be welcomed by philosophers and historians of science, scholars of Victorian studies, and students of the history of philosophy and political economy.
|Keywords||Philosophy, English Science History Political science History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$36.95 used (33% off) $49.66 new (10% off) $52.25 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B1607.S69 2006|
|ISBN(s)||0226767337 9780226767338 9780226214320|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John Losee (1983). Whewell and Mill on the Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (2):113-126.
Laura J. Snyder (2007). 'Lord Only of the Ruffians and Fiends'? William Whewell and the Plurality of Worlds Debate. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (3):584-592.
Samuel Hollander (1983). William Whewell and John Stuart Mill on the Methodology of Political Economy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 14 (2):127-168.
Sandra M. Den Otter (1996). British Idealism, and Social Explanation: A Study in Late Victorian Thought. Oxford University Press.
M. W. Taylor (1992). Men Versus the State: Herbert Spencer and Late Victorian Individualism. Oxford University Press.
John F. Metcalfe (1991). Whewell's Developmental Psychologism: A Victorian Account of Scientific Progress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 22 (1):117-139.
Menachem Fisch & Simon Schaffer (eds.) (1991). William Whewell: A Composite Portrait. Clarendon Press.
Suzy Anger (2005). Victorian Interpretation. Cornell University Press.
Aaron D. Cobb (2011). History and Scientific Practice in the Construction of an Adequate Philosophy of Science: Revisiting a Whewell/Mill Debate. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):85-93.
James R. Moore (ed.) (1981). Science and Metaphysics in Victorian Britain. Open University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #97,113 of 1,099,961 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #90,379 of 1,099,961 )
How can I increase my downloads?