Pronouns and Propositional Attitudes

The main questions we have asked are 'What do these pronouns refer to?', 'What are they coreferential with (or intended to be coreferential with)?' and 'How is their reference determined?' In the case of (1 b) these questions have often been answered by noting an ambiguity. On one
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/4545117
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Thomas J. McKay (1991). Representingde Re Beliefs. Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (6):711 - 739.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Alex Grzankowski (2012). Not All Attitudes Are Propositional. European Journal of Philosophy (3):374-391.
John Zeimbekis (2004). Propositional Attitudes in Fiction. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):261-276.
Indrek Reiland (2012). Propositional Attitudes and Mental Acts. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):239-245.
Jerry A. Fodor (1978). Propositional Attitudes. The Monist 61 (October):501-23.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

13 ( #194,523 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.