The philosophical significance of the Kripkean necessary aposteriori

Philosophical Issues 16 (1):288–309 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1533-6077.2006.00115.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Monstrous a priori.Manfred Kupffer - manuscript
Hacker's Complaint.Scott Soames - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (224):426 - 435.
Qualia, Kripkean arguments, and subjectivity.Emmett L. Holman - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:411-29.
Review of Scott Soames, Philosophical Essays Volume 2: The Philosophical Significance of Language. [REVIEW]Cara Spencer - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (6).
A naturalistic interpretation of the Kripkean modality.Feng Ye - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):454-470.
Kripke on epistemic and metaphysical possibility: Two routes to the necessary aposteriori.Scott Soames - 2011 - In Alan Berger (ed.), Saul Kripke. Cambridge University Press. pp. 167-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
114 (#150,984)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Scott Soames
University of Southern California

Citations of this work

Imagining as a Guide to Possibility.Peter Kung - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (3):620-663.
Centered communication.Clas Weber - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (S1):205-223.
Actually.Scott Soames - 2007 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81 (1):251-277.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references