The substance and significance of the dispute over two-dimensionalism
Philosophical Books 48 (1):34-49 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTheodore Sider (2003). Against Vague Existence. Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):135 - 146.
Chung–Ying Cheng (2002). On the Metaphysical Significance of Ti (Body–Embodiment) in Chinese Philosophy: Benti (Origin–Substance) and Ti–Yong (Substance and Function). Journal of Chinese Philosophy 29 (2):145–161.
John Hawthorne (2008). Three-Dimensionalism Vs. Four-Dimensionalism. In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell Pub..
Alan Carter (2011). Primitive Persistence and the Impasse Between Three-Dimensionalism and Four-Dimensionalism. Journal of Philosophy 108 (11).
Josh Parsons (2000). Must a Four-Dimensionalist Believe in Temporal Parts? The Monist 83 (3):399-418.
Kit Fine (2008). In Defence of Three-Dimensionalism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 83 (62):1-16.
Robert Michels (2012). Soames's Argument 1 Against Strong Two-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Studies 161 (3):403-420.
Theodore Sider (1997). Four-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-08-21Total downloads38 ( #30,920 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,263 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
