David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Language 27 (3):229-238 (2012)
I consider three theses that are friendly to anthropomorphism. Each makes a claim about what can be inferred about the mental life of chimpanzees from the fact that humans and chimpanzees both have behavioral trait B and humans produce this behavior by having mental trait M. The first thesis asserts that this fact makes it probable that chimpanzees have M. The second says that this fact provides strong evidence that chimpanzees have M. The third claims that the fact is evidence that chimpanzees have M. The third thesis follows from a plausible Reichenbachian model of how a common ancestor is probabilistically related to its descendants. The first two theses do not, and they have no general evolutionary justification
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Frans B. M. de Waal (1999). Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial. Philosophical Topics 27 (1).
Branden Fitelson (1999). The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure Sensitivity. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):378.
Daniel J. Povinelli & Jennifer Vonk (2003). Chimpanzee Minds: Suspiciously Human? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (4):157-160.
Elliott Sober & Martin Barrett (1992). Conjunctive Forks and Temporally Asymmetric Inference. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (1):1 – 23.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Roche (2013). Povinelli's Problem and Introspection. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (4):559-576.
Similar books and articles
Elliott Sober & Steven Hecht Orzack (2003). Common Ancestry and Natural Selection. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (3):423-437.
Brian L. Keeley (2004). Anthropomorphism, Primatomorphism, Mammalomorphism: Understanding Cross-Species Comparisons. Biology and Philosophy 19 (4):521-540.
Josep Call & Michael Tomasello (2005). What Chimpanzees Know About Seeing, Revisited: An Explanation of the Third Kind. In Naomi Eilan, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press. 45--64.
Andrew Fenton, Re-Conceiving Nonhuman Animal Knowledge Through Contemporary Primate Cognitive Studies.
Elliott Sober (1987). Parsimony, Likelihood, and the Principle of the Common Cause. Philosophy of Science 54 (3):465-469.
Adam Clark Arcadi (2003). Is Gestural Communication More Sophisticated Than Vocal Communication in Wild Chimpanzees? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):210-211.
Victoria Horner, Kristin E. Bonnie & Frans B. M. de Waal (2005). Identifying the Motivations of Chimpanzees: Culture and Collaboration. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):704-705.
Yuko Hattori, Masaki Tomonaga & Kazuo Fujita (2012). Chimpanzees (iPan Troglodytes/I) Show More Understanding of Human Attentional States When They Request Food in the Experimenters Hand Than on the Table. Interaction Studies 12 (3):418-429.
Sylvia Blad (2010). The Impact of 'Anthropotechnology' on Human Evolution. Techné 14 (2):72-87.
Sarah Stebbins (1993). Anthropomorphism. Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):113-122.
David R. Hilbert (1993). Comments on Anthropomorphism. Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):123-127.
Daniel J. Povinelli & Jennifer Vonk (2004). We Don't Need a Microscope to Explore the Chimpanzee's Mind. Mind and Language 19 (1):1-28.
Claudia Rudolf von Rohr, Judith Burkart & Carel van Schaik (2011). Evolutionary Precursors of Social Norms in Chimpanzees: A New Approach. Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):1-30.
Added to index2012-06-02
Total downloads13 ( #119,196 of 1,098,618 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #113,599 of 1,098,618 )
How can I increase my downloads?