Confirmation and law-likeness
Philosophical Review 97 (1):93-98 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Forge (1984). Theoretical Functions, Theory and Evidence. Philosophy of Science 51 (3):443-463.
Franz Huber (2005). What Is the Point of Confirmation? Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1146-1159.
Phillip J. Rody (1978). (C) Instances, the Relevance Criterion, and the Paradoxes of Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 45 (2):289-302.
Steven I. Miller & Marcel Fredericks (1991). A Case for "Qualitative Confirmation" for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Philosophy of Science 58 (3):452-467.
Jared Darlington (1959). On the Confirmation of Laws. Philosophy of Science 26 (1):14-24.
R. G. Swinburne (1970). Choosing Between Confirmation Theories. Philosophy of Science 37 (4):602-613.
Aron Edidin (1988). From Relative Confirmation to Real Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 55 (2):265-271.
Severin Schroeder (2009). Hempel's Paradox, Law-Likeness and Causal Relations. Philosophical Investigations 32 (3):244-263.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads25 ( #50,364 of 556,774 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #16,099 of 556,774 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
