Does "fitness" fit the facts?: A reply to Williams and Rosenberg's rejoinder
Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):220-223 (1987)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAlex Rosenberg (2004). Fitness, Probability and the Principles of Natural Selection. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):693 - 712.
Alex Rosenberg (1991). Adequacy Criteria for a Theory of Fitness. Biology and Philosophy 6 (1):38-41.
Charles Sayward (1972). True Propositions: A Reply to C.J.F. Williams. Analysis 32 (3):101-106.
Alexander Rosenberg (1982). On the Propensity Definition of Fitness. Philosophy of Science 49 (2):268-273.
Elliott Sober & Richard C. Lewontin (1983). Reply to Rosenberg on Genic Selectionism. Philosophy of Science 50 (4):648-650.
Alexander Rosenberg & Mary Williams (1986). Fitness as Primitive and Propensity. Philosophy of Science 53 (3):412-418.
Elliott Sober (1984). Fact, Fiction, and Fitness: A Reply to Rosenberg. Journal of Philosophy 81 (7):372-383.
Mary B. Williams & Alexander Rosenberg (1985). "Fitness" in Fact and Fiction: A Rejoinder to Sober. Journal of Philosophy 82 (12):738 - 749.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,284 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
