Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):443-446 (2008)
|Abstract||In my paper “Intelligent Design Theory and the Supernatural—the ‘God or Extra-Terrestrial’ Reply,” I argued that Intelligent Design (ID) Theory, when coupled with independently plausible further assumptions, leads to the conclusion that a supernatural intelligent designer exists. ID theory is therefore not neutral on the question of whether there are supernatural agents. In this respect, it differs from the Darwinian theory of evolution. John Beaudoin replies to my paper in his “Sober on Intelligent Design Theory and the Intelligent Designer,” arguing that my paper faces two challenges. In the present paper, I try to address Beaudoin’s challenges|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
John Beaudoin (2008). Sober on Intelligent Design Theory and the Intelligent Designer. Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):432-442.
Elliott Sober (2007). Intelligent Design Theory and the Supernatural—the 'God or Extra-Terrestrials' Reply. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):72-82.
Piotr Bylica (2003). Testowalność teorii inteligentnego projektu. Filozofia Nauki 2.
Chunyu Dong (2010). Intelligent Design From the Viewpoint of Complex Systems Theory. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):461-470.
Sahotra Sarkar (2011). Sober on Intelligent Design. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):683-691.
Jeffrey Koperski (2003). Intelligent Design and the End of Science. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (4):567-588.
Elliott Sober, Sex Ratio Theory, Ancient and Modern — an 18th Century Debate About Intelligent Design and the Development of Models in Evolutionary Biology.
Elliott Sober (2002). Intelligent Design and Probability Reasoning. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (2):65-80.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads11 ( #99,396 of 548,969 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )
How can I increase my downloads?