Lies, lies, and more lies: A plea for propositions
Philosophical Studies 67 (1):51-69 (1992)
| Abstract | To resolve putative liar paradoxes it is sufficient to attend to the distinction between liar-sentences and the propositions they would express, and to exercise the option of turning would-be deductions of paradox (of contradictions) into reductions of the existence of those propositions. Defending the coherence of particular resolutions along these lines, leads to recognition of the non-extensionality of some liar-sentences. In particular, it turns out that exchanges of terms for identicals in the open-sentence '- does not expression a true proposition' are not invariably truth-preserving because they are not invariably proposition-expression preserving. All of this recommends propositions as fruitful subjects of interesting renewed research | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
M. P. T. Leahy (1977). Lies, Damned Lies, and Miss Anscombe. Analysis 37 (2):80 - 81.
K. V. Wilkes (1994). Psychology and Politics: Lies, Damned Lies and Self-Deception. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 37:115-.
Jordan Howard Sobel (2008). 'Hoist with His Owne Petar':1 on the Undoing of a Liar Paradox. Theoria 74 (2):115-145.
Roy Sorenson (2007). Bald-Faced Lies! Lying Without the Intent to Deceive By. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (2):251-264.
Jon Barwise (1987). The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity. Oxford University Press.
Lloyd Bradley (ed.) (2005). Book of Lies. Andrews Mcmeel Pub..
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads21 ( #58,806 of 549,671 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,671 )How can I increase my downloads? |

