Mathematics and indispensability
Philosophical Review 102 (1):35-57 (1993)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesOtávio Bueno (2010). Quine's Double Standard: Undermining the Indispensability Argument Via the Indeterminacy of Reference. Principia 7 (1-2):17-39.
Mary Leng (2002). What's Wrong with Indispensability? Synthese 131 (3):395 - 417.
Chris Pincock (2007). A Role for Mathematics in the Physical Sciences. Noûs 41 (2):253 - 275.
David Liggins (2008). Quine, Putnam, and the 'Quine-Putnam' Indispensability Argument. Erkenntnis 68 (1):113 - 127.
Lieven Decock (2002). Quine's Weak and Strong Indispensability Argument. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (2):231-250.
Juha Saatsi (2011). The Enhanced Indispensability Argument: Representational Versus Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):143-154.
C. Cheyne (2002). The Indispensability of Mathematics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (3):378 – 379.
Mark Colyvan (2003). The Indispensability of Mathematics. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Anthony Peressini (1997). Troubles with Indispensability: Applying Pure Mathematics in Physical Theoryt. Philosophia Mathematica 5 (3):210-227.
Michael Resnik (1995). Scientific Vs. Mathematical Realism: The Indispensability Argument. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (2):166-174.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads26 ( #47,731 of 551,007 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 551,007 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
