David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Quine’s publication in 1951 of “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” was a watershed event in 20th century philosophy. In that essay, Quine sought to demolish the concepts of analyticity and a priority; he also sketched a positive proposal of his own -- epistemological holism. There can be little doubt that philosophy changed as a result of Quine’s work. The question I want to address here is whether it should have. My goal is not to argue for a return to the halcyon days of the logical empiricists. Rather, I want to take stock. Now, almost fifty years after the publication of “Two Dogmas,” what view should we take of analyticity, the a priori, and epistemological holism, and of what Quine said about these topics?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jacob Busch (2011). Is the Indispensability Argument Dispensable? Theoria 77 (2):139-158.
Russell Marcus (2014). The Holistic Presumptions of the Indispensability Argument. Synthese 191 (15):3575-3594.
Elliott Sober (2011). Reichenbach's Cubical Universe and the Problem of the External World. Synthese 181 (1):3 - 21.
Elliott Sober (2011). Reichenbach’s Cubical Universe and the Problem of the External World. Synthese 181 (1):3-21.
Similar books and articles
Åsa Maria Wikforss (2003). An a Posteriori Conception of Analyticity? Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):119-139.
Christopher Peacocke (2002). Three Principles of Rationalism. European Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):375–397.
Peter Pagin (2003). Quine and the Problem of Synonymy. Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):171-197.
Paul Gregory (2003). Putting the Bite Back Into. Principia 7 (1-2):115-129.
Richard Creath (1991). Every Dogma has its Day. Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):347-389.
Marian David (1996). Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth. Philosophical Perspectives 10:281 - 296.
Paul Gregory (2003). 'Two Dogmas'--All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633 - 648.
Paul A. Gregory (2003). Two Dogmas'–All Bark and No Bite? Carnap and Quine on Analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.
Herbert Schnädelbach (2003). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Fifty Years After. Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):7-12.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads286 ( #8,513 of 1,934,372 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #58,817 of 1,934,372 )
How can I increase my downloads?