David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:221-227 (2007)
Insanity is identified with irrationality, while rationality is considered to be the mark of sanity. Yet we want to say that rationality could be the cause of insanity. We can see a subtle kind of insanity inherent in an institution believed to be highly rational. Rationality in an ideological belief also turns into rational insanity when the ideology itself works for the interest of the advantaged as a tool of deception. We believe in the rationality of open communication. We believe that information technology has given us the most rational means for open communication. The Internet revolution or Internet democracy is expected to become the most rational means for the institutional goal of democracy. However the rationality of Internet communication has demonstrated a serious tendency to cause Internet insanity. We have been proud of being 'rational animals'. But now we are concerned because 'rational animal' could mean 'rational but animal-like' or 'rational but impulsive', which in turn could mean 'rational but violent' or 'rational but mad and insane'. Perhaps it is time for us to think seriously about the possibility of mass insanity through rational insanity, and seek the way beyond such rational insanity
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Herbert Fingarette (1972). Insanity and Responsibility. Inquiry 15 (1-4):6 – 29.
Edward Hinchman (2013). Rational Requirements and 'Rational' Akrasia. Philosophical Studies 166 (3):529-552.
James H. Moor (1976). Rationality and the Social Sciences. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:3 - 11.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (2000). Is It Rational To Be Rational? The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:115-122.
J. Anthony Blair (2012). Argumentation as Rational Persuasion. Argumentation 26 (1):71-81.
Stuart Rachels (2009). On Three Alleged Theories of Rational Behavior. Utilitas 21 (4):506-520.
Jyl Gentzler (2012). How Should I Be? A Defense of Platonic Rational Egoism. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):39-67.
J. Gunn (1985). Psychiatry and Ethics: Insanity, Rational Autonomy and Mental Health Care. Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (1):48-49.
Rem Blanchard Edwards (ed.) (1997). Ethics and Psychiatry: Insanity, Rational Autonomy, and Mental Health Care. Prometheus Books.
Rem Blanchard Edwards (ed.) (1982). Psychiatry and Ethics: Insanity, Rational Autonomy, and Mental Health Care. Prometheus Books.
Steve Matthews (2004). Failed Agency and the Insanity Defence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 27:413-424.
Tim van Gelder (1998). Review: Being There: Body and World Together Again, by Andy Clark. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 107 (4):647-650.
Duncan MacIntosh (1991). Preference's Progress: Rational Self-Alteration and the Rationality of Morality. Dialogue 30 (1991):3-32.
Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford (2000). The Rational Analysis of Mind and Behavior. Synthese 122 (1-2):93-131.
Niko Kolodny (2005). Why Be Rational? Mind 114 (455):509-563.
Added to index2011-12-02
Total downloads23 ( #179,406 of 1,938,441 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #155,197 of 1,938,441 )
How can I increase my downloads?