System and flexibility in law

Argumentation 5 (3):275-282 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Usually, rhetoric is supposed to provide a model of law which describes legal interactions as volitive, arbitrary, and void of any system. However, the Mainz School, founded by Theodor Viehweg, proves the contrary: without referring to any metaphysics, such as consensus or auditoire universel, it seeks to discover the systematic character and the more or less flexible structures of legal rhetoric

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A tree of life: diversity, flexibility, and creativity in Jewish law.Louis Jacobs - 2000 - Portland, Ore.: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization.
The legal system between order and disorder.Michel van de Kerchove - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by François Ost.
Fallibilism and the flexibility of epistemic modals.Charity Anderson - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):597-606.
Flexible realism, flexibility, and holism.Russell Pryba - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):41-46.
Two threats to representation.Michael Wheeler - 2001 - Synthese 129 (2):211-231.
David Hume and the Common Law of England.Neil McArthur - 2005 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (1):67-82.
Readings in the Philosophy of Law.John Arthur & William H. Shaw (eds.) - 1993 - Pearson Prentice Hall.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
16 (#851,323)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?