Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Theology 12 (2):293-315 (2000)
|Abstract||I examine three common beliefs about love: constancy, exclusivity, and the claim that love is a response to the properties of the beloved. Following a discussion of their relative consistency, I argue that neither the constancy nor the exclusivity of love are saved by the contrary belief, that love is not (entirely) a response to the properties of the beloved.|
|Keywords||Love, Rationality, Constancy, Exclusivity, Gellner|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher Grau (2010). Love and History. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):246-271.
Bennett W. Helm, Love. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Pierre Rousselot (2001). The Problem of Love in the Middle Ages: A Historical Contribution. Marquette University Press.
Roger E. Lamb (ed.) (1997). Love Analyzed. Westview Press.
Alan Soble (1987). The Unity of Romantic Love. Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):374-397.
Carolyn Price (2012). What is the Point of Love? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2):217-237.
Niko Kolodny (2003). Love as Valuing a Relationship. Philosophical Review 112 (2):135-189.
Stephen David Ross (2010). Self Love. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:129-152.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads40 ( #33,819 of 738,627 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #6,781 of 738,627 )
How can I increase my downloads?