David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Theology 12 (2):293-315 (2000)
I examine three common beliefs about love: constancy, exclusivity, and the claim that love is a response to the properties of the beloved. Following a discussion of their relative consistency, I argue that neither the constancy nor the exclusivity of love are saved by the contrary belief, that love is not (entirely) a response to the properties of the beloved.
|Keywords||Love, Rationality, Constancy, Exclusivity, Gellner|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Grau (2010). Love and History. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):246-271.
Bennett W. Helm, Love. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Troy A. Jollimore (2011). Love's Vision. Princeton University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
Simon May (2011). Love: A Secret History. Yale University Press.
Pierre Rousselot (2001). The Problem of Love in the Middle Ages: A Historical Contribution. Marquette University Press.
Roger E. Lamb (ed.) (1997). Love Analyzed. Westview Press.
Alan Soble (1987). The Unity of Romantic Love. Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):374-397.
Carolyn Price (2012). What is the Point of Love? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 20 (2):217-237.
Niko Kolodny (2003). Love as Valuing a Relationship. Philosophical Review 112 (2):135-189.
Stephen David Ross (2010). Self Love. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:129-152.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads161 ( #5,384 of 1,140,270 )
Recent downloads (6 months)28 ( #6,630 of 1,140,270 )
How can I increase my downloads?