Hastings Center Report 37 (4):40-50 (2007)
|Abstract||: HIPAA is often described as a privacy rule. It is not. In fact, HIPAA is a disclosure regulation, and it has effectively dismantled the longstanding moral and legal tradition of patient confidentiality. By permitting broad and easy dissemination of patients’ medical information, with no audit trails for most disclosures, it has undermined both medical ethics and the effectiveness of medical care.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
G. T. Laurie (2002). Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms. Cambridge University Press.
Anita L. Allen (2011). Commercial Speech Bruises Health Privacy in the Supreme Court. Hastings Center Report 41 (6):8-9.
Judith Wagner DeCew (1999). Alternatives for Protecting Privacy While Respecting Patient Care and Public Health Needs. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):249-255.
Judith Wagner DeCew (2004). Privacy and Policy for Genetic Research. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):5-14.
Lora Kutkat, James G. Hodge, Thomas Jeffry & Diana M. Bontá (2003). The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Reviewing the Post-Compliance Impact on Public Health Practice and Research. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (s4):70-72.
Mark A. Rothstein (2005). Currents in Contemporary Ethics: Research Privacy Under HIPAA and the Common Rule. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):154-159.
Myra Moran, Sissy Holloman, William Kassler & Beverly Dozier (2004). Living with the HIPAA Privacy Rule. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (s4):73-76.
Beverly Woodward & Dale Hammerschmidt (2003). Requiring Consent Vs. Waiving Consent for Medical Records Research: A Minnesota Law Vs. The U.S. (HIPAA) Privacy Rule. Health Care Analysis 11 (3):207-218.
Adam M. Croom (2010). Wittgenstein, Kripke, and the Rule Following Paradox. Dialogue 52 (3):103-109.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #99,458 of 549,010 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?