David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):517-527 (2010)
Richard Kraut's neo-Aristotelian account of well-being, Developmentalism, aspires to explain not only which things are good for us but why those things are good for us. The key move in attempting to make good on this second aspiration involves his claim that our ordinary intuitions about what is good for a person can be successfully explained and systematized by the idea that what benefi ts a living thing develops properly that living thing's potentialities, capacities, and faculties. I argue that Kraut's understanding of such proper development plays no serious constraining role in shaping the details of the account. If this is correct, Developmentalism lacks the potential to explain or vindicate the intuitions about what is good for us that it champions. In effect, Kraut offers us a list of things that he claims benefits a person, but he lacks a theory of what those things have in common such that they benefit him
|Keywords||Kraut Developmentalism Neo-Aristotealianism Well-being|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Scott Woodcock (2014). Neo-Aristotelian Naturalism and the Indeterminacy Objection. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (1):20-41.
Similar books and articles
Michelle Mason (2007). Richard Kraut, What is Good and Why: The Ethics of Well-Being. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (11).
Mariano Féliz (2012). Neo-Developmentalism: Beyond Neoliberalism? Capitalist Crisis and Argentina's Development Since the 1990s. Historical Materialism 20 (2):105-123.
Gregory J. Morgan (2001). Bacteriophage Biology and Kenneth Schaffner's Rendition of Developmentalism. Biology and Philosophy 16 (1):85-92.
Die Lo (2001). China After East Asian Developmentalism. Historical Materialism 8 (1):253-264.
Debra Nails (1993). Problems with Vlastos's Platonic Developmentalism. Ancient Philosophy 13 (2):273-291.
Thomas A. McCarthy (2007). From Modernism to Messianism: Liberal Developmentalism and American Exceptionalism. Constellations 14 (1):3-30.
Jane Rachner (1970). The Sufficiency Fallacy in Cognitive Developmentalism. Journal of Critical Analysis 2 (3):1-13.
Deane Curtin (1995). Making Peace with the Earth: Indigenous Agriculture and the Green Revolution. Environmental Ethics 17 (1):59-73.
Jason R. Raibley (2013). Health and Well-Being. Philosophical Studies 165 (2):469-489.
T. H. Irwin (1991). The Structure of Aristotelian Happiness:Aristotle on the Human Good. Richard Kraut. Ethics 101 (2):382-.
Jeff Behrends (2011). A New Argument for the Multiplicity of the Good-for Relation. Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (2):121-133.
Marisa Diaz-Waian & J. Angelo Corlett (2012). Kraut and Annas on Plato. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):157-195.
Kelly Johnson (2010). Developmentalism Then and Now : The Origins and Resurgence of an Enduring Grand Theory. In Howard J. Wiarda (ed.), Grand Theories and Ideologies in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan
Added to index2010-11-08
Total downloads101 ( #32,992 of 1,780,099 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #166,601 of 1,780,099 )
How can I increase my downloads?