David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (1):93 - 110 (1992)
A close reading of Luther's treatise on "Temporal Authority" and a review of the most pertinent Luther scholarship show why Luther's doctrine of the two kingdoms remains notoriously difficult to interpret. Reinhold Niebuhr's criticism of Luther in "The Nature and Destiny of Man" is representative of widespread discontent with Luther's argument, but Niebuhr misses the soteriological point of Luther's distinction between the two kingdoms and the significance of salvation for life in society. Ironically, Niebuhr must cite Luther in such a way as to confuse the kingdoms in order to support his charge that Luther's position leads to "quietism" and "defeatism.".
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Martin Luther, Desiderius Erasmus, E. Gordon Rupp & Philip S. Watson (eds.) (1969). Luther and Erasmus: Free Will and Salvation. Philadelphia, Westminster Press.
Martin Luther (1957). Martin Luther on the Bondage of the Will: A New Translation of De Servo Arbitrio (1525) Martin Luther's Reply to Erasmus of Rotterdam. J. Clarke.
Martin Luther (1957). Martin Luther on the Bondage of the Will. [Westwood, N.J.]Revell.
R. F. T. (1958). New Light on Martin Luther, with an Authentic Account of the Luther Film of 1953. Review of Metaphysics 12 (1):145-145.
Stewart W. Herman (1997). Luther, Law, and Social Covenants: Cooperative Self-Obligation in the Reconstruction of Lutheran Social Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (2):257 - 275.
Michael Seidler (1993). Religion, Populism, and Patriarchy: Political Authority From Luther to Pufendorf:Luther and Calvin on Secular Authority Martin Luther, John Calvin, Harro Hopfl; The Radical Reformation Michael G. Baylor; Political Writings Francisco de Vitoria, Anthony Pagden, Jeremy Lawrance; Patriarcha and Other Writings Robert Filmer, Johann P. Sommerville; On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law Samuel Pufendorf, James Tully, Michael Silverthorne. Ethics 103 (3):551-.
S. F. (2000). Tommi Lehtonen Punishment, Atonement and Merit in Modern Philosophy of Religion. (Schriften der Luther–Agricola Gesellschaft, 44). (Helsinki: Luther–Agricola Society, 1999). Pp. 292. £15.00 Pbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 36 (1):123-125.
Martin Luther (1923/1931). The Bondage of the Will. London, Sovereign Grace Union.
Luther Hess Waring (1910/1968). The Political Theories of Martin Luther. Port Washington, N.Y.,Kennikat Press.
Krzysztof Brzechczyn (2004). The Concept of Nonviolence in the Political Theology of Martin Luther King. In Roman Kozłowski Karolina M. Cern (ed.), Prawo, władza, suwerenność [Law, Power, Sovereignty]. Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
Stanley Hauerwas (1995). Remembering Martin Luther King Jr. Remembering: A Response to Christopher Beem. Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (1):135 - 148.
Jesse Couenhoven (2000). Grace as Pardon and Power: Pictures of the Christian Life in Luther, Calvin, and Barth. Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (1):63 - 88.
Karl Clifton-Soderstrom (2009). The Phenomenology of Religious Humility in Heidegger's Reading of Luther. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (2):171-200.
Frederiek Depoortere (2007). “God Himself Is Dead!” Luther, Hegel, and the Death of God. Philosophy and Theology 19 (1/2):171-195.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads10 ( #161,493 of 1,413,434 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,636 of 1,413,434 )
How can I increase my downloads?