Graduate studies at Western
South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):24-35 (2008)
|Abstract||This paper is concerned with Sir Peter Strawson’s critical discussion of Paul Grice’s defence of the material implication analysis of conditionals. It argues that although Strawson’s own ‘consequentialist’ suggestion concerning the meaning of conditionals cannot be correct, a related and radically contextualist account is able to both account for the phenomena that motivated Strawson’s consequentialism, and to undermine the material implication analysis by providing a simpler account of the processes that we go through when interpreting conditionals.|
|Keywords||Strawson conditionals Grice material implication contextualism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Sacks (2005). Sartre, Strawson and Others. Inquiry 48 (3):275-299.
Philip N. Johnson-Laird, Ruth M. J. Byrne & Vittorio Girotto (2009). The Mental Model Theory of Conditionals: A Reply to Guy Politzer. Topoi 28 (1):75-80.
John Hyman (2003). The Evidence of Our Senses. In Strawson and Kant. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Frank Jackson (ed.) (1991). Conditionals. Oxford University Press.
Paul F. Snowdon (1998). Strawson on the Concept of Perception. In The Philosophy of P.F. Strawson. Chicago: Open Court.
Stapp (2006). Commentary on Strawson's Target Article. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (s 10-11):163-169.
G. N. Georgacarakos (1980). Equationally Definable Implication Algebras for Orthomodular Lattices. Studia Logica 39 (1):5 - 18.
Added to index2009-11-11
Total downloads36 ( #38,072 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,222 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?