David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
South African Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):24-35 (2008)
This paper is concerned with Sir Peter Strawson’s critical discussion of Paul Grice’s defence of the material implication analysis of conditionals. It argues that although Strawson’s own ‘consequentialist’ suggestion concerning the meaning of conditionals cannot be correct, a related and radically contextualist account is able to both account for the phenomena that motivated Strawson’s consequentialism, and to undermine the material implication analysis by providing a simpler account of the processes that we go through when interpreting conditionals.
|Keywords||Strawson conditionals Grice material implication contextualism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Sacks (2005). Sartre, Strawson and Others. Inquiry 48 (3):275-299.
H. P. Stapp (2006). Commentary on Strawson's Target Article. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (s 10-11):163-169.
Paul F. Snowdon (1998). Strawson on the Concept of Perception. In The Philosophy of P.F. Strawson. Chicago: Open Court.
Frank Jackson (ed.) (1991). Conditionals. Oxford University Press.
Philip N. Johnson-Laird, Ruth M. J. Byrne & Vittorio Girotto (2009). The Mental Model Theory of Conditionals: A Reply to Guy Politzer. Topoi 28 (1):75-80.
G. N. Georgacarakos (1980). Equationally Definable Implication Algebras for Orthomodular Lattices. Studia Logica 39 (1):5 - 18.
Added to index2009-11-11
Total downloads36 ( #39,721 of 1,018,179 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #65,344 of 1,018,179 )
How can I increase my downloads?