David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Intellectual Impostures , for example, written together with Jean Bricmont, the authors (hereafter S&B) criticise the way in which French poststructuralist critics, such as Julia Kristeva, Jacques Lacan and Gilles Deleuze, have abused the scientific terminology to which, Sokal claims, they exhibit slavish adherence. Many authors, such as Andrew Ross and Stanley Aronowitz, have taken up the cudgels against S&B. But their replies often miss the mark either by arguing at too abstract a level against S&B's project as a whole or employing strategies and principles drawn from the self same body of texts which S&B criticize. In this article, by contrast, I reply to specific criticisms S&B direct against Lacan's use of topological concepts. By showing that S&B miss a perfectly reasonable, mathematically acceptable way of reading Lacan's appropriation of topology, I intend to raise more general doubts about S&B's erudition in connection with the works they criticise.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Shannon Winnubst (1999). Exceeding Hegel and Lacan: Different Fields of Pleasure Within Foucault and Irigaray. Hypatia 14 (1):13-37.
Bettina Schmitz & tr Jansen, Julia (2005). Homelessness or Symbolic Castration? Subjectivity, Language Acquisition, and Sociality in Julia Kristeva and Jacques Lacan. Hypatia 20 (2):69-87.
Henry Krips (1992). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (1):137-139.
Jean-Michel Rabaté (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Lacan. Cambridge University Press.
Ed Pluth (2006). Lacan's Subversion of the Subject. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):293-312.
Jean-Philippe Bouilloud (2003). The Reception of the Sokal Affair in France—"Pomo" Hunting or Intellectual Mccarthyism?: A Propos of Impostures Intellectuelles by A. Sokal and J. Bricmont. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (1):122-137.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #210,628 of 1,780,719 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #290,888 of 1,780,719 )
How can I increase my downloads?