Husserl Studies 24 (3):167-175 (2008)
|Abstract||Husserl’s Idea of Phenomenology is his first systematic attempt to show how phenomenology differs from natural science and in particular psychology. He does this by the phenomenological reduction. One of his achievements is to show that the formal structures of intentionality are more akin to logic than to psychology. I claim that Husserl’s argument can be made more intuitive if we consider phenomenology to be the study of truth rather than knowledge, and if we see the reduction as primarily a modification in our vocabulary and discourse and not as simply a change in attitude. I briefly compare Husserl’s concept of philosophy with those of Plato and Kant.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Amie L. Thomasson (2005). First-Person Knowledge in Phenomenology. In David Woodruff Smith & Amie L. Thomasson (eds.), Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Elisabeth Ströker (1993). Husserl's Transcendental Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
Edmund Husserl & Marvin Farber (eds.) (1940/1968). Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl. New York, Greenwood Press.
Dan Zahavi (2003). Husserl's Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
R. O. Elveton (1970). The Phenomenology of Husserl. Chicago,Quadrangle Books.
Søren Overgaard (2008). How to Analyze Immediate Experience:. Hintikka, Husserl, and the Idea of Phenomenology. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):282–304.
Sebastian Luft (1998). Husserl's Phenomenological Discovery of the Natural Attitude. Continental Philosophy Review 31 (2):153-170.
Paul Ricœur (1967/2007). Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Sebastian Luft (2011). Subjectivity and Lifeworld in Transcendental Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads77 ( #10,399 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,790 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?