David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (3):381-390 (2003)
It has been suggested that a new form of moral responsibility, labeled “social products liability,” is relevant to business ethics.In particular, this kind of responsibility might justify recent legal claims against firearm manufacturers. This paper argues that, as ithas been presented, social products liability must rest upon utilitarian considerations or on a deeper, more complete theory of moralresponsibility. In the first case, a new form of responsibility seems unnecessary, since liability could be directly apportioned on utilitariangrounds. In the second case, proponents of social products liability face the tasks of presenting the more complete theory and then anchoring social products liability to it
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
George G. Brenkert (2000). Social Products Liability. Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):21-32.
Amelia J. Uelmen (2004). Toward a Trinitarian Theory of Products Liability. Journal of Catholic Social Thought 1 (2):603-645.
Theodore M. Benditt (1982). Liability for Failing to Rescue. Law and Philosophy 1 (3):391 - 418.
Gordon G. Sollars (2001). An Appraisal of Shareholder Proportional Liability. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (4):329 - 345.
John R. Danley (2005). Polishing Up the Pinto. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (2):205-236.
Nuno Ferreira, Putting the Age of Criminal and Civil Liability Into Context: A Dialogue Between Law with Psychology.
Edmund F. Byrne (2007). Assessing Arms Makers' Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3):201 - 217.
Antony Duff (2009). Legal and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Mark S. Blodgett & Patricia J. Carlson (1997). Corporate Ethics Codes: A Practical Application of Liability Prevention. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1363-1369.
R. G. Frey & Christopher W. Morris (eds.) (1991). Liability and Responsibility: Essays in Law and Morals. Cambridge University Press.
Toby Handfield & Trevor Pisciotta (2005). Is the Risk–Liability Theory Compatible with Negligence Law? Legal Theory 11 (4):387-404.
Sandro Castaldo, Francesco Perrini, Nicola Misani & Antonio Tencati (2009). The Missing Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Trust: The Case of Fair Trade Products. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 84 (1):1 - 15.
Ana S. Iltis (2006). Research, Development, and the Availability of Health Care Products: The Market, Regulation, and Legal Liability. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (2-3):195-208.
Andrew Piker (1998). Strict Product Liability and the Unfairness Objection. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8):885-893.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads2 ( #258,148 of 1,088,725 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,725 )
How can I increase my downloads?