David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Northwestern University Law Review 83 (1):54-135 (1989)
The thesis of "Freedom of Communicative Action" is that Jurgen Habermas's theory of communicative action illuminated the deep structure of the First Amendment freedom of speech. Haberams's theory takes speech act theory as its point of departure. Communicative action coordinates indivudal behavior through rational understanding. Communicative action is distinguished from strategic action--the use of communication to manipulate, deceive, or coerce. Part I offers an introduction. Part II outlines a hermeneutic approach to interpretation of the First Amendent. Part III explores and criticizes existing theories of the freedom of speech. Part IV explicates Habermas's theory of communicative action. Part V developes a theory of the freedom of expression based on Habermas's theory of communication. Part VI applies that theory to particular problems in free speech doctrine. Part VII draws some conclusions about the implications of this exercise for the development of doctrine and the theory of communicative action. "Freedom of Communicative Action" was published in 1989, and some of the views expressed in the article are no longer affirmed by the author.
|Keywords||freedom of speech Habermas freedom of expression communicative action equality of communicative opportunity ideal speech situation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrew Koppelman (2013). Darwall, Habermas, and the Fluidity of Respect. Ratio Juris 26 (4):523-537.
Similar books and articles
Johan Siebers (2011). What Cannot Be Said: Speech and Violence. Journal of Global Ethics 6 (2):89-102.
Erling Skjei (1985). I. A Comment on Performative, Subject, and Proposition in Habermas's Theory of Communication. Inquiry 28 (1-4):87 – 105.
Joseph Heath (1998). What is a Validity Claim? Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (4):23-41.
Kyung-Man Kim (2011). Habermas on Understanding: Virtual Participation, Dialogue and the Universality of Truth. [REVIEW] Human Studies 34 (4):393-406.
Eva Erman (2006). Reconciling Communicative Action with Recognition: Thickening the ‘Inter’ of Intersubjectivity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):377-400.
Jürgen Habermas (1985). II. Reply to Skjei∗. Inquiry 28 (1-4):105-113.
Gerhard Wagner & Heinz Zipprian (1991). Intersubjectivity and Critical Consciousness: Remarks on Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action. Inquiry 34 (1):49 – 62.
Raimo Tuomela (2002). Collective Goals and Communicative Action. Journal of Philosophical Research 27:29-64.
Piet Strydom (2001). The Problem of Triple Contingency in Habermas. Sociological Theory 19 (2):165-186.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #129,065 of 1,911,733 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #180,473 of 1,911,733 )
How can I increase my downloads?