Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (3):347-368 (2011)
|Abstract||Recent work in neurophilosophy has either made reference to the work of John Dewey or independently developed positions similar to it. I review these developments in order first to show that Dewey was indeed doing neurophilosophy well before the Churchlands and others, thereby preceding many other mid-twentieth century European philosophers’ views on cognition to whom many present day philosophers refer (e.g., Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty). I also show that Dewey’s work provides useful tools for evading or overcoming many issues in contemporary neurophilosophy and philosophy of mind. In this introductory review, I distinguish between three waves among neurophilosophers that revolve around the import of evolution and the degree of brain-centrism. Throughout, I emphasize and elaborate upon Dewey’s dynamic view of mind and consciousness. I conclude by introducing the consciousness-as-cooking metaphor as an alternative to both the consciousness-as-digestion and consciousness-as-dancing metaphors. Neurophilosophical pragmatism—or neuropragmatism—recognizes the import of evolutionary and cognitive neurobiology for developing a science of mind and consciousness. However, as the cooking metaphor illustrates, a science of mind and consciousness cannot rely on the brain alone—just as explaining cooking entails more than understanding the gut—and therefore must establish continuity with cultural activities and their respective fields of inquiry. Neuropragmatism advances a new and promising perspective on how to reconcile the scientific and manifest images of humanity as well as how to reconstruct the relationship between science and the humanities|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matthew J. Brown (2012). John Dewey's Logic of Science. Hopos 2 (2):258-306.
Scott Johnston (2010). Dewey's 'Naturalized Hegelianism' in Operation: Experimental Inquiry as Self-Consciousness. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (3):453-476.
William S. Robinson (2004). Understanding Phenomenal Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
David J. Chalmers (2004). How Can We Construct a Science of Consciousness? In Michael S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences Iii. Mit Press.
Michel Ferrari & Adrien Pinard (2006). Death and Resurrection of a Disciplined Science of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (12):75-96.
Paul L. Nunez (2010). Brain, Mind, and the Structure of Reality. Oxford University Press.
A. G. Cairns-Smith (1996). Evolving the Mind: On the Nature of Matter and the Origin of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Pete Mandik (2009). The Neurophilosophy of Subjectivity. In John Bickle (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
Tom Burke (1994). Dewey's New Logic: A Reply to Russell. University of Chicago Press.
Antti Revonsuo (1993). Is There a Ghost in the Cognitive Machinery? Philosophical Psychology 6 (4):387-405.
Jean E. Burns (1991). Contemporary Models of Consciousness, Part II. Journal of Mind and Behavior 12:407-420.
Robert W. Lurz (2004). In Search of the Metaphor of the Mind: A Critical Review of Baars' in the Theater of Consciousness. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 17 (2):297 – 307.
Added to index2011-04-06
Total downloads43 ( #26,222 of 550,802 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,802 )
How can I increase my downloads?