David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 53 (4):435-454 (2003)
: Fate and fatalism have been powerful notions in many societies, from Homer's Iliad, the Greek moira, the South Asian karma, and the Chinese ming in the ancient world to the modern concept of "destiny." But fate and fatalism are now treated with philosophical disdain or as a clearly inferior version of what is better considered as "determinism." The concepts of fate and fatalism are defended here, and fatalism is clearly distinguished from determinism. Reference is made to the ancient Greek and Chinese versions to explore the various dimensions of these ideas.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Margaret Visser (2002). Beyond Fate. House of Anansi Press.
J. den Boeft (1970). Calcidius on Fate. Leiden,Brill.
Ardaser Sorabjee N. Wadia (1931). Fate and Free-Will. Toronto, J.M. Dent & Sons, Ltd..
Michael Gelven (1991). Why Me?: A Philosophical Inquiry Into Fate. Northern Illinois University Press.
Paul Russell (2000). Compatibilist Fatalism. In A. van den Beld (ed.), Moral Responsibility and Ontology. Kluwer. 199--218.
Steven M. Cahn (1967). Fate, Logic, and Time. New Haven, Yale University Press.
Sarah Broadie (2001). From Necessity to Fate: A Fallacy. [REVIEW] Journal of Ethics 5 (1):21-37.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads200 ( #1,929 of 1,017,558 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #15,897 of 1,017,558 )
How can I increase my downloads?