In Memoriam: the X Phi Debate

The Philosophers' Magazine (52):89-93 (2011)
Abstract
Experimental philosophy has received a great deal of attention in scholarly journals and the popular media. Often the topic of these articles is precisely what I claim is a non-issue – the value of experimental philosophy as a movement. And here I am writing about this same topic yet again. But I am not going to provide another argument for an obvious position. Instead, I’m writing this as an obituary – an obituary for the so-called controversy about experimental philosophy, and an attempt to diagnose how it lived as long as it did
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA
    Similar books and articles
    William E. Mann (2009). The Guilty Mind. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):41 - 63.
    Joshua Knobe (2004). What is Experimental Philosophy? The Philosophers' Magazine 28:37-39.
    Dag Westerståhl (1996). Self-Commuting Quantifiers. Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):212-224.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-12-02

    Total downloads

    44 ( #32,029 of 1,089,047 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    6 ( #17,281 of 1,089,047 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.