In Memoriam: the X Phi Debate

The Philosophers' Magazine (52):89-93 (2011)
Abstract
Experimental philosophy has received a great deal of attention in scholarly journals and the popular media. Often the topic of these articles is precisely what I claim is a non-issue – the value of experimental philosophy as a movement. And here I am writing about this same topic yet again. But I am not going to provide another argument for an obvious position. Instead, I’m writing this as an obituary – an obituary for the so-called controversy about experimental philosophy, and an attempt to diagnose how it lived as long as it did
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,350
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
William E. Mann (2009). The Guilty Mind. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):41 - 63.
Joshua Knobe (2004). What is Experimental Philosophy? The Philosophers' Magazine 28:37-39.
Dag Westerståhl (1996). Self-Commuting Quantifiers. Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):212-224.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-02

Total downloads

47 ( #33,486 of 1,096,714 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #53,220 of 1,096,714 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.