David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review 16 (4):473-481 (2004)
Abstract Posner's ?pragmatic? defense of broad judicial deference to legislative power still reflects the shortcomings noted in my review of his Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. His pragmatism still fails to provide meaningful criteria for decision making that do not collapse into an indeterminate relativism; and his argument that strict constraints on judicial power are required by respect for democracy underestimates the importance of two serious interconnected weaknesses of the modern state: widespread voter ignorance, and interest?group exploitation of that ignorance.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
T. Clark Durant & Michael Weintraub (2011). Altruism, Righteousness, and Myopia. Critical Review 23 (3):257-302.
Similar books and articles
Ilya Somin (2004). Richard Posner's Democratic Pragmatism and the Problem of Ignorance. Critical Review 16 (1):1-22.
Richard A. Posner (2004). Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy: Reply to Somin. Critical Review 16 (4):465-471.
Robert B. Talisse (2004). Does Public Ignorance Defeat Deliberative Democracy? Critical Review 16 (4):455-463.
Samuel Freeman (1990). Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review. Law and Philosophy 9 (4):327 - 370.
Bradley W. Miller (2007). Review Essay: A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review by WJ Waluchow. American Journal of Jurisprudence 52.
Stephen Gardbaum (2002). Review: Robert Justin Lipkin, Constitutional Revolutions: Pragmatism and the Role of Judicial Review in American Constitutionalism. [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (4):838-841.
Ilya Somin (2000). Democracy and Voter Ignorance Revisited: Rejoinder to Ciepley. Critical Review 14 (1):99-111.
A. Harel (2003). Rights-Based Judicial Review: A Democratic Justification. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):247-276.
Thom Brooks (2009). A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
Alison Kadlec (0040). Critical Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Theoria (=117;User_Persona=false;ord=1234):54-80.
Christian Barry (2008). Christopher F. Zurn,Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review:Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review. Ethics 118 (4):767-772.
David Ciepley (1999). Democracy Despite Voter Ignorance: A Weberian Reply to Somin and Friedman. Critical Review 13 (1-2):191-227.
Corey Brettschneider (2005). Balancing Procedures and Outcomes Within Democratic Theory: Corey Values and Judicial Review. Political Studies 53:423-451.
Roberto Frega & Fabrizio Trifirò (eds.) (2010). Pragmatism and Democracy. Ethics & Politics, 12, 1 2010.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads9 ( #177,829 of 1,410,434 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,872 of 1,410,434 )
How can I increase my downloads?