Richard Posner's democratic pragmatism and the problem of ignorance

Critical Review 16 (1):1-22 (2004)
Abstract Richard Posner's Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy urges that political and legal decision makers should be guided by what he calls ?everyday pragmatism,? rather than by ?abstract? moral theory. He links his conception of pragmatic government to Sclmmpeter's unromantic view of democracy. Posner argues that judicial review should be based on a combination of pragmatism and adherence to this limited conception of democracy, rather than sticking closely to ?formalist? theories of adjudication, which demand strict adherence to traditional legal norms. However, Posner's consequentialist pragmatism fails to provide an adequate guide to judicial decision making, because it does not give us any criterion for deciding which consequences are desirable. His Schumpeterian theory of democracy, too, is problematic because it does not sufficiently consider the shortcomings exposed in recent scholarship in political science and economics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/08913810408443596
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,974
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
R. M. Dworkin (1988). Law's Empire. Harvard University Press.
Amy Gutmann (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Richard A. Posner (2004). Legal Pragmatism. Metaphilosophy 35 (1-2):147-159.
Thom Brooks (2009). A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
Alison Kadlec (0040). Critical Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Theoria (=117;User_Persona=false;ord=1234):54-80.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

8 ( #267,637 of 1,725,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,716 of 1,725,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.