Dogmatism, junk knowledge, and conditionals
Philosophical Quarterly 38 (153):433-454 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAssaf Sharon & Levi Spectre (2010). Dogmatism Repuzzled. Philosophical Studies 148 (2).
Frank Jackson (ed.) (1991). Conditionals. Oxford University Press.
Linton Wang (2008). Epistemic Comparative Conditionals. Synthese 162 (1):133 - 156.
Crispin Wright (2007). The Perils of Dogmatism. In Nuccetelli & Seay (eds.), Themes from G. E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Malcolm Schofield, Myles Burnyeat & Jonathan Barnes (eds.) (1980). Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Tom Stoneham (2003). Conditionals and Biconditionals in Constitutive Theories of Self-Knowledge. Philosophical Papers 32 (2):149-55.
Chris Tucker (2010). Why Open-Minded People Should Endorse Dogmatism. Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):529-545.
Lawrence A. Shapiro (1997). Junk Representations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):345-361.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads66 ( #13,644 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #12,390 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
