Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):193 - 214 (1996)
|Abstract||Semantic indeterminacy is the ether of philosophy of language. It fills the interstices of our intentions and pervades accounts of presupposition, tense, fiction, translation, and especially, vagueness. Yet semantic indeterminacy is as impossible as ectoplasm. Indeed, more so! The demonstration need only borrow a few assumptions used elsewhere in widely accepted impossibility results. Since an impossibility is never a necessary condition for anything actual, semantic indeterminacy must be superfluous. Language is no more explained by semantic indeterminacy than calculus is explained by (pre-Robinsonian) infinitesimals.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Patrick Greenough (2008). Indeterminate Truth. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):213-241.
Torin Alter & Stuart Rachels (2004). Epistemicism and the Combined Spectrum. Ratio 17 (3):241-255.
Bradford Skow (2010). Deep Metaphysical Indeterminacy. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (241):851 - 858.
Günter Abel (1994). Indeterminacy and Interpretation. Inquiry 37 (4):403 – 419.
James A. Woodbridge & Bradley Armour-Garb (2008). The Pathology of Validity. Synthese 160 (1):63 - 74.
Philip L. Peterson (1984). Semantic Indeterminacy and Scientific Underdetermination. Philosophy of Science 51 (3):464-487.
Martin Montminy (2011). Indeterminacy, Incompleteness, Indecision, and Other Semantic Phenomena. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):73-98.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,399 of 739,407 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,256 of 739,407 )
How can I increase my downloads?