Was Descartes's cogito a diagonal deduction?
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (3):346-351 (1986)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul Ricoeur (1996). The Crisis of the Cogito. Synthese 106 (1):57 - 66.
David Woodruff Smith (1993). The Cogito Circa Ad 2000. Inquiry 36 (3):225 – 254.
Bernd Magnus, James Benjamin Wilbur & Laurence J. Lafleur (eds.) (1970). Cartesian Essays: A Collection of Critical Studies. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
William J. Rapaport (1976). On Cogito Propositions. Philosophical Studies 29 (1):63-68.
David B. Wong (1982). Cartesian Deduction. Philosophy Research Archives 8:1-19.
Husain Sarkar (2003). Descartes' Cogito: Saved From the Great Shipwreck. Cambridge University Press.
Peter Slezak (2010). Doubts About Indubitability. Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
Peter Slezak (2010). Doubts About Descartes' Indubitability: The Cogito as Intuition and Inference. Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
Peter Slezak (1983). Descartes's Diagonal Deduction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (March):13-36.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads16 ( #74,564 of 548,970 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,970 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
