Como resolver la problematica pirronica: lo que se aprende de Descartes
| Abstract | Descartes's epistemology is placed in the context of the Pyrrhonian problematic of the notorious triad: circle, regress, or foundations. It is argued that Descartes has been radically misinterpreted. His real focus is not the problem of the external world, nor is he a foundationalist. When we place his epistemology in its proper, Pyrrhonian, context, his views emerge as much more subtle and instructive to us today (and, I suspect, tomorrow). No Cartesian he, Descartes offers an epistemology whose architectural elegance survives the erosion of its individual stones. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesErnest Sosa (1997). How to Resolve the Pyrrhonian Problematic: A Lesson From Descartes. Philosophical Studies 85 (2-3):229-249.
Akinori Hayashi (2008). Descartes. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:133-140.
Dale Jacquette (1996). Descartes' Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320.
Michael Della Rocca (2005). Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):1–33.
Michael Della Rocca (2005). Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):1-33.
Ruth Weintraub (1997). The Cartesian Circle and Two Forms of Scepticism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (4):365 - 377.
Noa Naaman Zauderer (2010). Descartes' Deontological Turn: Reason, Will, and Virtue in the Later Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Kenneth R. Westphal (1987). Sextus Empiricus Contra René Descartes. Philosophy Research Archives 13:91-128.
Thomas C. Vinci (1998). Cartesian Truth. Oxford University Press.
Bernd Magnus, James Benjamin Wilbur & Laurence J. Lafleur (eds.) (1970). Cartesian Essays: A Collection of Critical Studies. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.
José Luis Bermúdez (1997). Scepticism and Science in Descartes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):743-772.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-11-17Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
