Dubious assertions

Philosophical Studies 146 (2):269 - 272 (2009)
Abstract
The knowledge account of assertion—roughly: one should not assert what one does not know—aspires to identify the norm distinctive of assertion. One main argument given in support of the knowledge account has been the success with which it explains a variety of Moore-paradoxical assertion. But that explanation does not generalize satisfactorily.
Keywords Norms of assertion  Knowledge account  Moore’s paradox
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Keith DeRose (2002). Assertion, Knowledge, and Context. Philosophical Review 111 (2):167-203.
Keith DeRose (1991). Epistemic Possibilities. Philosophical Review 100 (4):581-605.

View all 18 references

Citations of this work BETA
Martin Montminy (2013). Explaining Dubious Assertions. Philosophical Studies 165 (3):825-830.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

115 ( #6,825 of 1,089,063 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #15,179 of 1,089,063 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.