Philosophical Issues 6:91-99 (1995)
|Abstract||What is involved in acquiring a russellian proposition (x, φ) as content of an attitude: what does it take for one to acquire such an attitude de re? How do we gain access to x itself so as to be able to have (x, φ) as content of our thought?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David J. Chalmers (2011). Propositions and Attitude Ascriptions: A Fregean Account. Noûs 45 (4):595-639.
Kirk A. Ludwig (1993). Direct Reference in Thought and Speech. Communication and Cognition 26 (1):49-76.
Ernest Sosa (1995). More on Fregean Reference. Philosophical Issues 6:113-122.
Boyd Millar (2013). Colour Constancy and Fregean Representationalism. Philosophical Studies 164 (1):219-231.
Adam Pautz (2008). An Argument Against Fregean That-Clause Semantics. Philosophical Studies 138 (3):335 - 347.
Gabriel Segal (2009). Keep Making Sense. Synthese 170 (2):275 - 287.
Bryan Frances (1998). Defending Millian Theories. Mind 107 (428):703-728.
William G. Lycan (1995). On Sosa's "Fregean Reference Defended". Philosophical Issues 6:100-103.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #85,901 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?