On Reflective Knowledge: replies to Battaly and Reed

Synthese 188 (2):309-321 (2012)
Abstract
This article is a reply to Baron Reed and Heather Battaly, two critics in a book symposium on my Reflective Knowledge. The reply to Reed concerns the main content and structure of Descartes's epistemology. The reply to Battaly concerns how best to deal with epistemic circularity
Keywords Descartes  Epistemic circularity  Reflective knowledge  The Cartesian Circle
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Ram Neta (2011). Reflections on Reflective Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 153 (1):3 - 17.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-10-03

Total downloads

31 ( #57,204 of 1,102,744 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

16 ( #11,077 of 1,102,744 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.