Graduate studies at Western
Dialectica 53 (3-4):227-41 (1999)
|Abstract||This paper tries to clarify the nature of philosophical questions as to the ontological nature of things, especially persons. It considers implications of an Aristotelian account, which leads to an ontology that makes subjects and other things epistemologically remote. This makes the account doubtfully reconcilable with the special epistemic relation that each of us has to oneself, via for example the cogito.|
|Keywords||Body Essentialism Metaphysics Person Property Supervenience|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lloyd P. Gerson (2003). Knowing Persons: A Study in Plato. Oxford University Press.
Charles Taliaferro (1997). Possibilities in the Philosophy of Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):127-37.
William Hasker (2001). Persons as Emergent Substances. In Kevin J. Corcoran (ed.), Soul, Body, and Survival: Essays on the Metaphysics of Human Persons. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
William S. Larkin (2004). Persons, Animals, and Bodies. Southwest Philosophy Review 20 (2):95-116.
David H. Jones (1972). Emergent Properties, Persons, and the Mind-Body Problem. Southern Journal of Philosophy 10 (4):423-33.
William Hasker (2004). The Constitution View of Persons: A Critique. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):23-34.
Lynne Baker (2007). Persons and Other Things. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 5-6):17-36.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2002). The Ontological Status of Persons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):370-388.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2000). Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads35 ( #39,306 of 739,400 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,423 of 739,400 )
How can I increase my downloads?