Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Review 105 (3):373-402 (1996)
Relocating Kripke's puzzle about belief, this paper investigates i) in what the puzzle consists, exactly; ii) the method used in its construction; and iii) relations between meaning and rationality. Essential to Kripke's puzzle is a normative notion of contradictory belief. Different positions about the meaning of names yield different views of what constitutes the attribution of contradictory belief; and Kripke's puzzle unwittingly _imports
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David F. Austin (1990). What's the Meaning of 'This'?: A Puzzle About Demonstrative Belief. Cornell University Press.
John Hyman (2010). The Road to Larissa. Ratio 23 (4):393-414.
Kent Bach (2000). A Puzzle About Belief Reports. In K. Jaszczolt (ed.), The Pragmatics of Propositional Attitude Reports. Elsevier.
Lewis Powell (2012). How to Refrain From Answering Kripke's Puzzle. Philosophical Studies 161 (2):287-308.
Igal Kvart (1987). Kripke's Belief Puzzle. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):287-325.
Neil Feit (2001). Rationality and Puzzling Beliefs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):29 - 55.
Neil Feit (2001). Rationality and Puzzling Beliefs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):29-55.
Philip Atkins (2013). A Pragmatic Solution to Ostertag's Puzzle. Philosophical Studies 163 (2):359-365.
David Sosa (1996). The Import of the Puzzle About Belief. Philosophical Review 105 (3):373 - 402.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads121 ( #5,395 of 739,366 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #13,438 of 739,366 )
How can I increase my downloads?