Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Issues 5:29-50 (1994)
|Abstract||I am grateful to both Richards, Foley and Fumerton, for the time and attention that they have given to my work. I have certainly learned from their excellent comments, just as I expected. Given the constraints, however, I must be selective in my response. First of all, I will aim to present my view of human knowledge in a broader context. Against this background I will then respond to several of the points they have made.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephen Grimm (2001). Ernest Sosa, Knowledge, and Understanding. Philosophical Studies 106 (3):171--191.
Ted Poston (2007). Acquaintance and the Problem of the Speckled Hen. Philosophical Studies 132 (2):331 - 346.
Christopher Lepock (2006). Adaptability and Perspective. Philosophical Studies 129 (2):377 - 391.
Richard Foley & Richard Fumerton (1982). Epistemic Indolence. Mind 91 (361):38-56.
Richard Foley & Richard Fumerton (1985). Davidson's Theism? Philosophical Studies 48 (1):83 - 89.
Richard Foley & Richard Fumerton (1984). Epistemic Indolence: A Reply to Schmitt. Mind 93 (369):108-110.
Richard Foley (1990). Fumerton's Puzzle. Journal of Philosophical Research 15:109-113.
Sven Bernecker (2006). Prospects for Epistemic Compatibilism. Philosophical Studies 130 (1):81-104.
E. J. Coffman (2013). Problems for Foley's Accounts of Rational Belief and Responsible Belief. Res Philosophica 90 (2):147-160.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,693 of 754,397 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,000 of 754,397 )
How can I increase my downloads?