Virtue perspectivism: A response to Foley and Fumerton
Philosophical Issues 5:29-50 (1994)
| Abstract | I am grateful to both Richards, Foley and Fumerton, for the time and attention that they have given to my work. I have certainly learned from their excellent comments, just as I expected. Given the constraints, however, I must be selective in my response. First of all, I will aim to present my view of human knowledge in a broader context. Against this background I will then respond to several of the points they have made. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Grimm (2001). Ernest Sosa, Knowledge, and Understanding. Philosophical Studies 106 (3):171--191.
Ted Poston (2007). Acquaintance and the Problem of the Speckled Hen. Philosophical Studies 132 (2):331 - 346.
Christopher Lepock (2006). Adaptability and Perspective. Philosophical Studies 129 (2):377 - 391.
Richard Foley & Richard Fumerton (1982). Epistemic Indolence. Mind 91 (361):38-56.
Richard Foley & Richard Fumerton (1985). Davidson's Theism? Philosophical Studies 48 (1):83 - 89.
Richard Foley & Richard Fumerton (1984). Epistemic Indolence: A Reply to Schmitt. Mind 93 (369):108-110.
Richard Foley (1990). Fumerton's Puzzle. Journal of Philosophical Research 15:109-113.
Sven Bernecker (2006). Prospects for Epistemic Compatibilism. Philosophical Studies 130 (1):81-104.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,150 of 548,970 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,970 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
