David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):633-650 (2012)
The paper develops ethical guidelines for the development and usage of persuasive technologies (PT) that can be derived from applying discourse ethics to this type of technologies. The application of discourse ethics is of particular interest for PT, since ‘persuasion’ refers to an act of communication that might be interpreted as holding the middle between ‘manipulation’ and ‘convincing’. One can distinguish two elements of discourse ethics that prove fruitful when applied to PT: the analysis of the inherent normativity of acts of communication (‘speech acts’) and the Habermasian distinction between ‘communicative’ and ‘strategic rationality’ and their broader societal interpretation. This essay investigates what consequences can be drawn if one applies these two elements of discourse ethics to PT.
|Keywords||Ethics Persuasive technology Discourse ethics Habermas Speech-act theory Critical theory Persuasion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. L. Austin (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.
Peter-Paul Verbeek (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State University Press.
Jürgen Habermas (1978/1971). Knowledge and Human Interests. Heinemann Educational.
Don Ihde (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Nagenborg (2014). Surveillance and Persuasion. Ethics and Information Technology 16 (1):43-49.
Barbara Begier (2014). Effective Cooperation with Energy Consumers. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 12 (2):107-121.
Cosima Rughiniş, Răzvan Rughiniş & Ştefania Matei (2015). A Touching App Voice Thinking About Ethics of Persuasive Technology Through an Analysis of Mobile Smoking-Cessation Apps. Ethics and Information Technology 17 (4):295-309.
Similar books and articles
J. Rossi & M. Yudell (2012). The Use of Persuasion in Public Health Communication: An Ethical Critique. Public Health Ethics 5 (2):192-205.
Ana Nettel & Georges Roque (2012). Persuasive Argumentation Versus Manipulation. Argumentation 26 (1):55-69.
Michael Davis (1999). Rhetoric, Technical Writing, and Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4):463-478.
Hossein Emamalizadeh (1985). The Informative and Persuasive Functions of Advertising: A Moral Appraisal — a Comment. Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):151 - 153.
Raphaël Micheli (2012). Arguing Without Trying to Persuade? Elements for a Non-Persuasive Definition of Argumentation. Argumentation 26 (1):115-126.
Ghislain Deslandes & Kenneth Casler (2011). Indirect Communication and Business Ethics. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (3-4):307-330.
Lynn Thiesmeyer (1999). Racism on the Web: Its Rhetoric and Marketing. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):117-125.
Sherry Baker (1999). Five Baselines for Justification in Persuasion. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (2):69 – 81.
Martin Brigham & Lucas D. Introna (2007). Invoking Politics and Ethics in the Design of Information Technology: Undesigning the Design. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):1-10.
Iordanis Kavathatzopoulos (2003). The Use of Information and Communication Technology in the Training for Ethical Competence in Business. Journal of Business Ethics 48 (1):43 - 51.
H. W. Love (1992). Communication, Accountability and Professional Discourse: The Interaction of Language Values and Ethical Values. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 11 (11):883-892.
Alfred Driessen (2009). Ethical Aspects of Research in Ultrafast Communication. In Paul Sollie & Marcus Düwell (eds.), Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technology Developments. Springer
David H. Smith & Loyd S. Pettegrew (1986). Mutual Persuasion as a Model for Doctor-Patient Communication. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Bernd Carsten Stahl, Richard Heersmink, Philippe Goujon, Catherine Flick, Jeroen van den Hoven, Kutoma Wakunuma, Veikko Ikonen & Michael Rader (2010). Identifying the Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies: An Essay on Issues, Concepts and Method. International Journal of Technoethics 1 (4):20-38.
Bruce Drake, Kristi Yuthas & Jesse F. Dillard (2000). It'sonly Words -- Impacts of Information Technology on Moral Dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (1):41-59.
Added to index2011-05-11
Total downloads43 ( #92,317 of 1,789,721 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #261,181 of 1,789,721 )
How can I increase my downloads?