David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy Compass 7 (10):741-751 (2012)
Recent years have seen a growing interest in Buddhist thought as a potential source of alternative conceptions of the nature of the mind and the relation between the mental and the physical. This article considers and assesses three different models of what contemporary philosophy of mind can learn from Buddhist thought. One model, advocated by Alan Wallace, holds that we can learn from Buddhist meditation that both individual consciousness and the physical world itself emerge from a deeper, “primordial” consciousness. A second model, supported by Owen Flanagan, maintains that we should accept from Buddhist thought only what is compatible with physicalism, and thus draws from Buddhism only insights into moral psychology and spirituality. Evan Thompson has developed a third, phenomenological approach, which derives from Buddhism a non‐dualistic account of the relation between the mental and the physical, dissolving the “explanatory gap” between them. I suggest that all of these models face significant challenges, and propose a different model derived from the Buddhist philosopher Nāgārjuna, which shows the potential to resolve some of the challenges facing contemporary theories of consciousness
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson & Eleanor Rosch (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press.
David J. Chalmers (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.
Jaegwon Kim (2005). Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton University Press.
Evan Thompson (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press.
John Heil (2003). From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bronwyn Finnigan (2011). How Can a Buddha Come to Act?: The Possibility of a Buddhist Account of Ethical Agency. Philosophy East and West 61 (1):134-160.
Daniel Anderson Arnold (2012). Brains, Buddhas, and Believing: The Problem of Intentionality in Classical Buddhist and Cognitive-Scientific Philosophy of Mind. Columbia University Press.
Mario D'Amato (2013). Buddhist Fictionalism. Sophia 52 (3):409-424.
H. W. Bailey (ed.) (2010). Buddhist Poetry, Thought, and Diffusion. International Academy of Indian Culture and Aditya Prakashan.
E. Steinilber-Oberlin (1938). The Buddhist Sects of Japan, Their History, Philosophical Doctrines and Sanctuaries. London, G. Allen & Unwin, Ltd..
Noa Ronkin (2005). Early Buddhist Metaphysics: The Making of a Philosophical Tradition. London ; New Yorkroutledgecurzon.
S. R. Bhatt (ed.) (2003). Buddhist Thought and Culture in India and Korea. Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
Jay L. Garfield (2006). Why Did Bodhidharma Go to the East? Buddhism's Struggle with the Mind in the World. Sophia 45 (2):61-80.
Padmasiri De Silva (1998). Environmental Philosophy and Ethics in Buddhism. St. Martin's Press.
Peter Harvey & Mark Siderits (2004). An Introduction to Buddhist Ethics: Foundations, Values and Issues. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31 (3):405–409.
Ashok Kumar Chatterjee (1975). Facets of Buddhist Thought. Sanskrit College.
Mark Siderits (2005). The Buddhist Unconscious: The Alaya-Vijnana in the Context of Indian Buddhist Thought (Review). Philosophy East and West 55 (2):358-363.
Added to index2012-09-19
Total downloads28 ( #111,105 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #231,316 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?