Ockham's rule of supposition: Two conflicts in his theory
Vivarium 12 (1):63-73 (1974)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTerence Parsons (1997). Supposition as Quantification Versus Supposition as Global Quantificational Effect. Topoi 16 (1).
Alfred J. Freddoso (1979). O-Propositions and Ockham's Theory of Supposition. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20 (4):741-750.
Graham Priest & Stephen Read (1977). The Formalization of Ockham's Theory of Supposition. Mind 86 (341):109-113.
Gareth B. Matthews (1964). Ockham's Supposition Theory and Modern Logic. Philosophical Review 73 (1):91-99.
Gareth B. Matthews (1997). Two Theories of Supposition? Topoi 16 (1).
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2008). An Intensional Interpretation of Ockham's Theory of Supposition. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):pp. 365-393.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2007). Theory of Supposition Vs. Theory of Fallacies in Ockham. Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):343-359.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads28 ( #44,160 of 549,699 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,699 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
