Revolutionary and familiar, inevitable and precarious: Rhetorical contradictions in enthusiasm for nanotechnology [Book Review]
NanoEthics 1 (1):57-68 (2007)
|Abstract||This paper analyses rhetorics of scientific and corporate enthusiasm surrounding nanotechnology. I argue that enthusiasts for nanotechnologies often try to have it both ways on questions concerning the nature and possible impact of these technologies, and the inevitability of their development and use. In arguments about their nature and impact we are simultaneously informed that these are revolutionary technologies with the potential to profoundly change the world and that they merely represent the extension of existing technologies. They are revolutionary and familiar. In debates surrounding possible regulation of these technologies it is claimed both that their development is inevitable, so that regulation would be fruitless, and that increased research funding and legislative changes are necessary in order that we can enjoy their benefits. That is, they are inevitable and precarious. An increased awareness of these rhetorical contradictions may allow us better to assess the likely impact and future of nanotechnology.|
|Keywords||Ethics Funding Nanotechnology Public opinion Science Rhetoric Technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chris Groves, Lori Frater, Robert Lee & Elen Stokes (2011). Is There Room at the Bottom for CSR? Corporate Social Responsibility and Nanotechnology in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):525-552.
Alan Petersen (2009). Introduction: The Ethical Challenges of Nanotechnologies. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):9-12.
Rosalyn W. Berne (2006). Nanotalk: Conversations with Scientists and Engineers About Ethics, Meaning, and Belief in the Development of Nanotechnology. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Katrina Sifferd (2012). Changing the Criminal Character: Nanotechnology and Criminal Punishment. In A. Santosuosso (ed.), Proceedings of the 2011 Law and Science Young Scholars Symposium. Pavia University Press.
Andreas Woyke (2007). „Nanotechnologie” Als Neue „Schlüsseltechnologie”? —Versuch Eines Historischen Und Systematischen Vergleichs Mit Anderen Technologien / "Nanotechnology" as a New Keytechnology?—An Attempt of a Historical and Systematical Comparison with Other Technologies. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (2):329 - 345.
Robert Sparrow (2009). The Social Impacts of Nanotechnology: An Ethical and Political Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):13-23.
Shantesh Hede (2006). Molecular Materials and its Technology: Disruptive Impact on Industrial and Socio-Economic Areas. [REVIEW] AI and Society 21 (3):303-313.
Ellen-Marie Forsberg (2012). Standardisation in the Field of Nanotechnology: Some Issues of Legitimacy. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):719-739.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads11 ( #107,400 of 722,870 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,870 )
How can I increase my downloads?