Thomas Aquinas on the mixture of the elements, to master Philip of castrocaeli
| Abstract | seem to be a kind of corruption of the elements and not a mixture. Again, if the substantial form of a mixed body is the act of matter without presupposing the forms of simple bodies, then the simple bodies of the elements will lose their definition (rationem). For an element is that of which something is primarily composed, and exists in it and is indivisible ac-. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesMasanori Kaji (2003). Mendeleev's Discovery of the Periodic Law: The Origin and the Reception. Foundations of Chemistry 5 (3):189-214.
Michael V. Antony (2001). Conceiving Simple Experiences. Journal of Mind and Behavior 22 (3):263-86.
S. Le Vent (2001). What is a Perfect Gas Mixture? Foundations of Chemistry 3 (3):227-239.
Michael Weisberg (2004). Interpreting Aristotle on Mixture: Problems About Elemental Composition From Philoponus to Cooper. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):681–706.
Gustavo Sarmiento (2005). On Kant’s Definition of the Monad in the Monadologia Physica of 1756. Kant-Studien 96 (1):1-19.
Silas Langley (2001). Aquinas, Resurrection, and Material Continuity. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:135-147.
Paul Needham (2006). Substance and Modality. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):829-840.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,239 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
