|Abstract||What I want to talk about here is a puzzle for historians of philosophy who, like me, have spent a fair amount of time studying the history of mediaeval logic and semantic theory. I don’t know how to solve it, but in various forms it has come up repeatedly in my own work and in the work of colleagues I have talked with about it. I would like to share it with you now.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Paul Vincent Spade (1994). How to Start and Stop. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:193-221.
J. G. Dawson (1954). Philosophical Surveys, VIII: A Survey of Work on Mediaeval Philosophy, 1945-53: Part II: Mediaeval Philosophers of the Christian West. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 4 (14):60-74.
Steve Clarke (2002). Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):131-150.
Paul Vincent Spade (1987). Five Early Theories in the Mediaeval Insolubilia-Literature. Vivarium 25 (1):24-46.
David Coady (2007). Are Conspiracy Theorists Irrational? Episteme 4 (2):193-204.
David Coady (2003). Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):197-209.
Charles Pigden (1995). Popper Revisited, or What is Wrong with Conspiracy Theories? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):3-34.
Brian L. Keeley (2007). God as the Ultimate Conspiracy Theory. Episteme 4 (2):135-149.
Don S. Levi (2010). Against the Logicians. The Philosopher's Magazine 51 (51):80-86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #74,434 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?