David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
What I want to talk about here is a puzzle for historians of philosophy who, like me, have spent a fair amount of time studying the history of mediaeval logic and semantic theory. I don’t know how to solve it, but in various forms it has come up repeatedly in my own work and in the work of colleagues I have talked with about it. I would like to share it with you now.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Vincent Spade (1994). How to Start and Stop. Journal of Philosophical Research 19:193-221.
Brian L. Keeley (2007). God as the Ultimate Conspiracy Theory. Episteme 4 (2):135-149.
Charles Pigden (1995). Popper Revisited, or What is Wrong with Conspiracy Theories? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):3-34.
David Coady (2003). Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):197-209.
David Coady (2007). Are Conspiracy Theorists Irrational? Episteme 4 (2):193-204.
Paul Vincent Spade (1987). Five Early Theories in the Mediaeval Insolubilia-Literature. Vivarium 25 (1):24-46.
Steve Clarke (2002). Conspiracy Theories and Conspiracy Theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):131-150.
J. G. Dawson (1954). Philosophical Surveys, VIII: A Survey of Work on Mediaeval Philosophy, 1945-53: Part II: Mediaeval Philosophers of the Christian West. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 4 (14):60-74.
Don S. Levi (2010). Against the Logicians. The Philosophers' Magazine 51 (51):80-86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #78,298 of 1,088,831 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,665 of 1,088,831 )
How can I increase my downloads?