David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (1):73 – 88 (2000)
This article deals with the ambigous situation of philosophical aesthetics, which now seems to have lost its proper object. Moreover, Arthur C. Danto has popularized talk of an end of art, in which he ties that end to the end of any aesthetic master narrative. Comparing modern and medieval approaches to art, this paper tries to reformulate the question of philosophical aesthetics, which has to be understood in a hermeneutical way. Taken in a heuristic manner 'art' and 'beauty' remain the principal aesthetic categories able to keep the understanding of what belongs to aesthetics open to different historical approaches.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Barbara Bolt (ed.) (2007). Sensorium: Aesthetics, Art, Life. Cambridge Scholars Pub..
Meg Harris Williams (2010). The Aesthetic Development: The Poetic Spirit of Psychoanalysis: Essays on Bion, Meltzer, Keats. Karnac.
Anne D. R. Sheppard (1987). Aesthetics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Art. Oxford University Press.
Peter K. Walhout (2009). The Beautiful and the Sublime in Natural Science. Zygon 44 (4):757-776.
Harold Osborne (1972). Aesthetics. London,Oxford University Press.
Alexander Nehamas (2007). Only a Promise of Happiness: The Place of Beauty in a World of Art. Princeton University Press.
Kathleen Kadon Desmond (2011). Ideas About Art. Wiley-Blackwell.
Paul Mattick (ed.) (1993). Eighteenth-Century Aesthetics and the Reconstruction of Art. Cambridge University Press.
Diarmuid Costello (2004). On Late Style: Arthur Danto’s the Abuse of Beauty. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):424-439.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #53,373 of 1,006,576 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #28,154 of 1,006,576 )
How can I increase my downloads?