Conceptual precursors to language
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Because human languages vary in sound and meaning, children must learn which distinctions their language uses. For speech perception, this learning is selective: initially infants are sensitive to most acoustic distinctions used in any language1–3, and this sensitivity reﬂects basic properties of the auditory system rather than mechanisms speciﬁc to language4–7; however, infants’ sensitivity to non-native sound distinctions declines over the course of the ﬁrst year8. Here we ask whether a similar process governs learning of word meanings. We investigated the sensitivity of 5-month-old infants in an English-speaking environment to a conceptual distinction that is marked in Korean but not English; that is, the distinction between ‘tight’ and ‘loose’ ﬁt of one object to another9,10. Like adult Korean speakers but unlike adult English speakers, these infants detected this distinction and divided a continuum of motion-into-contact actions into tightand loose-ﬁt categories. Infants’ sensitivity to this distinction is linked to representations of object mechanics11that are shared by non-human animals12–14. Language learning therefore seems to develop by linking linguistic forms to universal, pre-existing representations of sound and meaning. Our research focuses on the crosscutting conceptual distinctions between actions producing loose- and tight-ﬁtting contact relationships (compare left and right columns in Fig. 1a) and actions producing containment versus support relationships (compare ﬁrst and second rows in Fig. 1a). As early as Korean and English children begin to talk about such actions, they categorize them differently from one another and similarly to Korean- and Englishspeaking adults9,15. Moreover, English and Korean adults differ in their performance on non-linguistic categorization tasks involving heterogeneous examples of these actions, in accord with the differing semantics of their languages16,17, whereas the performance of young children on such tasks has been mixed9,10,18,19..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Terry Regier (2005). The Emergence of Words: Attentional Learning in Form and Meaning. Cognitive Science 29 (6):819-865.
Heather M. Norbury, Sandra R. Waxman & Hyun-Joo Song (2008). Tight and Loose Are Not Created Equal: An Asymmetry Underlying the Representation of Fit in English- and Korean-Speakers. Cognition 109 (3):316-325.
Robert M. Seyfarth, Dorothy L. Cheney & Thore J. Bergman (2005). Primate Social Cognition and the Origins of Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (6):264-266.
Tilbe Göksun, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, Mutsumi Imai, Haruka Konishi & Hiroyuki Okada (2011). Who is Crossing Where? Infants’ Discrimination of Figures and Grounds in Events. Cognition 121 (2):176-195.
Jean M. Mandler (2004). Thought Before Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (11):508-513.
Similar books and articles
Soonja Choi & Kate Hattrup (2012). Relative Contribution of Perception/Cognition and Language on Spatial Categorization. Cognitive Science 36 (1):102-129.
B. Elsner & G. Aschersleben (2003). Do I Get What You Get? Learning About the Effects of Self-Performed and Observed Actions in Infancy. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):732-751.
Katerina Kantartzis, Mutsumi Imai & Sotaro Kita (2011). Japanese Sound-Symbolism Facilitates Word Learning in English-Speaking Children. Cognitive Science 35 (3):575-586.
Anna Papafragou (2002). Shake, Rattle, 'N' Roll: The Representation of Motion in Language and Cognition. Cognition 84 (2):189-219.
Erik D. Thiessen (2010). Effects of Visual Information on Adults' and Infants' Auditory Statistical Learning. Cognitive Science 34 (6):1093-1106.
Soonja Choi & Melissa Bowerman (1992). Learning to Express Motion Events in English and Korean : The Influence of Language Specific Lexicalization Patterns. In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical & Conceptual Semantics. Blackwell 83-121.
Jaehoon Yeon & Jieun Kiaer (eds.) (2010). Selected Papers From the 2nd European Conference on Korean Linguistics. Lincom Europa.
In Kyeong Kim & Elizabeth S. Spelke, Infants' Sensitivity to Effects of Gravity on Visible Object Motion.
Amanda L. Woodward (2005). Infants' Understanding of the Actions Involved in Joint Attention. In Naomi Eilan, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press
Andrew Martin, Sharon Peperkamp & Emmanuel Dupoux (2013). Learning Phonemes With a Proto-Lexicon. Cognitive Science 37 (1):103-124.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads32 ( #134,817 of 1,938,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #219,228 of 1,938,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?