OUP Oxford (2004)
|Abstract||Many organisms possess multiple sensory systems, such as vision, hearing, touch, smell, and taste. The possession of such multiple ways of sensing the world offers many benefits. These benefits arise not only because each modality can sense different aspects of the environment, but also because different senses can respond jointly to the same external object or event, thus enriching the overall experience - for example, looking at an individual while listening to them speak. However, combining information from different senses also poses many challenges for the nervous system. In recent years there has been dramatic progress in understanding how information from different sensory modalities gets integrated in order to construct useful representations of external space; and in how such multimodal representations constrain spatial attention. Such progress has involved numerous different disciplines, including neurophysiology, experimental psychology, neurological work with brain-damaged patients, neuroimaging studies, and computational modelling. This volume brings together the leading researchers from all these approaches, to present the first integrative overview of this central topic in cognitive neuroscience.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$23.56 used (71% off) $66.24 new (18% off) $75.99 direct from Amazon (6% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lawrence Warwick-Evans (2004). Multi-Sensory Processing Facilitates Perception but Direct Perception of Global Invariants Remains Unproven. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):891-892.
Gabriel Vacariu (2012). Cognitive Neuroscience Versus Epistemologically Different Worlds. University of Bucharest Press.
Casey O'Callaghan (forthcoming). Not All Perceptual Experience is Modality Specific. In Mohan Matthen, Dustin Stokes & Stephen Biggs (eds.), Perception and Its Modalities. Oxford.
Fiona Macpherson (ed.) (2011). The Senses: Classic and Contemporary Philosophical Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Christy Mag Uidhir (2012). Getting Emotional Over Contours: Response to Seeley. Essays in Philosophy 13 (2):518-521.
R. W. Kentridge, L. H. de-Wit & C. A. Heywood (2008). What is Attended in Spatial Attention? Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (4):105-111.
Mohan Matthen (forthcoming). Active Perception and the Representation of Space. In Dustin Stokes, Stephen Biggs & Mohan Matthen (eds.), Perception and Its Modalities. Oxford University Press.
Kirk A. Ludwig (1996). Shape Properties and Perception. In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Philosophical Issues. Atascadero: Ridgeview.
Y. Rossetti (1998). Implicit Short-Lived Motor Representations of Space in Brain Damaged and Healthy Subjects. Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):520-558.
Mohan Matthen (forthcoming). The Individuation of the Senses. In Mohan Matthen (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press.
Julian Kiverstein, Mirko Farina & Andy Clark (forthcoming). Substituting the Senses. In Mohan Matthen (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-01-31
Total downloads1 ( #291,771 of 722,874 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,874 )
How can I increase my downloads?