Epistemic two-dimensionalism and the epistemic argument

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):59 – 78 (2010)
One of Kripke's fundamental objections to descriptivism was that the theory misclassifies certain _a posteriori_ propositions expressed by sentences involving names as _a priori_. Though nowadays very few philosophers would endorse a descriptivism of the sort that Kripke criticized, many find two-dimensional semantics attractive as a kind of successor theory. Because two-dimensionalism needn't be a form of descriptivism, it is not open to the epistemic argument as formulated by Kripke; but the most promising versions of two-dimensionalism are open to a close relative of that argument.
Keywords two-dimensionalism  Chalmers  epistemic argument
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048400802674727
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Jeff Speaks (2013). No Easy Argument for Two-Dimensionalism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (4):775-781.
Scott Soames (2014). Epistemic Intensions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):220-228.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

189 ( #9,905 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

17 ( #45,081 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.