In defense of mentalism and emergent interaction
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Mind and Behavior 12 (2):221-245 (1991)
The mentalist mind-brain model is defended against alleged weaknesses. I argue that the perceived failings are based mostly on misinterpretation of mentalism and emergent interaction. Considering the paradigmatic concepts at issue and broad implications, I try to better clarify the misread mentalist view, adding more inclusive detail, relevant background, further analysis, and comparing its foundational concepts with those of the new cognitive paradigm in psychology. A changed "emergent interactionist" form of causation is posited that combines traditional microdeterminism with emergent "top-down" control. This emergent form of causation has wide application to causal explanation in general and is hypothesized to be the key common precursor for the consciousness revolution and subsequent boom in new worldviews, "systems thinking," emerging new paradigms, and other transformative developments of the 1970s and 1980s
|Keywords||Consciousness Emergentism Interactionism Mentalism Metaphysics Mind|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Evan Thompson & Francisco J. Varela (2001). Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (10):418-425.
Sandra D. Mitchell (2012). Emergence: Logical, Functional and Dynamical. [REVIEW] Synthese 185 (2):171-186.
Robert Francescotti (2007). Emergence. Erkenntnis 67 (1):47 - 63.
Peter A. Corning (2012). The Re-Emergence of Emergence, and the Causal Role of Synergy in Emergent Evolution. Synthese 185 (2):295-317.
Geoffrey M. Hodgson (2000). The Concept of Emergence in Social Sciences: Its History and Importance. Emergence: Complexity and Organization 2 (4):65-77.
Similar books and articles
Roger W. Sperry (1987). Structure and Significance of the Consciousness Revolution. Journal of Mind and Behavior 8 (1):37-65.
Juan Comesaña (2005). We Are (Almost) All Externalists Now. Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):59–76.
Hugh T. Wilder (1991). Against Naive Mentalism. Metaphilosophy (October) 281 (October):281-291.
Roger W. Sperry (1992). Turnabout on Consciousness: A Mentalist View. Journal of Mind and Behavior 13 (3):259-80.
Roger W. Sperry (1969). A Modified Concept of Consciousness. Psychological Review 76 (6):532-36.
Larry R. Vandervert (1991). On the Modeling of Emergent Interaction: Which Will It Be, the Laws of Thermodynamics or Sperry's "Wheel" in the Subcircuitry? Journal of Mind and Behavior 12 (4):535-39.
Roger W. Sperry (1980). Mind-Brain Interaction: Mentalism Yes, Dualism No. Neuroscience 5 (2):195-206.
Larry R. Vandervert (1991). A Measurable and Testable Brain-Based Emergent Interactionism. Journal of Mind and Behavior 201 (2):201-219.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?